ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026
Exercise-based interventions for problematic short-video use: a narrative review of current evidence and potential psychological pathways.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Problematic short-video use has become an emerging digital health concern among adolescents and college students. In this review, problematic short-video use is not treated as an independent clinical disorder with formal diagnostic status. Instead, it is conceptualized as an addiction-like pattern of digital-media use characterized by impaired control, psychological dependence, and real-world functional impairment. Using a theory-driven narrative review approach, this article organizes short-video-specific and transferable evidence around four overlapping pathways that may link exercise with problematic short-video use: reward substitution, emotional restoration, control restoration, and real-world reconnection. These pathways are theoretical propositions rather than established mechanisms, and support for them is uneven. Control restoration has the most direct, although still limited, support because it includes one small controlled exercise study; emotional restoration is supported mainly by short-video-specific association studies; and reward substitution and real-world reconnection rely more heavily on indirect or transferable evidence. The overall efficacy of exercise remains uncertain, and practical implications are preliminary because exercise type and dose, target populations, adherence, and implementation conditions have not been established. By distinguishing direct, reverse-direction, contextual, and transferable evidence, this review provides a structured synthesis of the field and identifies priority outcomes and design considerations for future controlled studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.