Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42756240›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2026

Mapping the research landscape of antibody therapy for Ebola virus disease: a bibliometric analysis.

Zengwei Kou, Yunsheng Liu, Wujie Qian, Sihan Zhang, Shulei Lou, Da Shao

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zengwei Kou *Research Center of Translational Medicine, Shanghai Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yunsheng Liu *Cancer Center, Shenzhen Hospital (Futian) of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, China.
Wujie Qian *College of Basic Medicine and Forensic Medicine, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China.
Sihan ZhangCollege of Basic Medicine and Forensic Medicine, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China.
Shulei LouCentral Laboratory, Linyi People's Hospital, Linyi, China.
Da ShaoResearch Center of Translational Medicine, Shanghai Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Antibody-based therapies have become a cornerstone of Ebola virus disease (EVD) treatment and prevention, particularly following the successful clinical development of monoclonal antibody therapeutics against Zaire ebolavirus. However, despite substantial advances, the global research landscape, collaboration patterns, and evolving thematic trends of Ebola antibody therapy have not been systematically characterized. The ongoing 2026 Bundibugyo ebolavirus outbreak, for which no licensed vaccines or therapeutics currently exist, further underscores the importance of understanding the development trajectory of this field. Methods: Publications related to antibody therapy for EVD published between 1990 and 2026 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection, PubMed, and Scopus databases. Following data integration, format conversion, and deduplication, a total of 1,350 unique publications were included. Bibliometric analyses were conducted using CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and Bibliometrix, complemented by Google Trends data to evaluate public interest and outbreak-related attention. Results: The field exhibited dynamic outbreak-driven growth, with major publication surges corresponding to the 2014-2016 West African Ebola epidemic and the period surrounding 2020. Although annual publication output declined after 2020, renewed public attention emerged during the 2026 Bundibugyo outbreak. The United States dominated both publication productivity and citation impact, followed by China, the United Kingdom, and Canada. Harvard University, the University of Texas System, and Scripps Research Institute were identified as leading institutions. Keyword co-occurrence and clustering analyses revealed five major thematic domains: fundamental virology and glycoprotein research, immunity and vaccination, infection and therapeutic development, cross-viral research involving COVID-19 and HIV, and clinically oriented studies focused on neutralizing antibodies, clinical trials, and convalescent plasma. Temporal analyses demonstrated a clear evolution from basic virology toward translational and clinical applications. Conclusions: Ebola antibody therapy research has undergone substantial expansion over the past three decades, driven largely by major outbreak events and advances in antibody engineering technologies. The current Bundibugyo outbreak highlights persistent vulnerabilities in existing countermeasure strategies and emphasizes the urgent need for broadly protective pan-ebolavirus antibody therapeutics. These findings provide a comprehensive overview of the intellectual structure, global collaborations, research hotspots, and future directions of antibody-based interventions against Ebola virus disease.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, ViralEbolavirusHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaBibliometricsDisease OutbreaksHumansAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Viralantibody therapybibliometric analysisEbola virusEbola virus diseaseimmunotherapymonoclonal antibody

Identifiers

PMID42756240
PMCPMC13582502

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.