ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Construction and application of an occupational health risk grading method based on risk matrix and dynamic weighting: a case study of footwear manufacturing enterprises.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Occupational hazard factors in the footwear manufacturing industry are complex and encompass benzene series compounds, ketones, esters, dust, noise, and other agents. Existing mainstream occupational health risk assessment methods-including the Singapore semi-quantitative risk assessment method (Ministry of Manpower method, hereafter referred to as the MOM method), the exposure ratio method specified in GBZ/T 298-2017 (hereafter referred to as the exposure ratio method), the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) inhalation risk assessment method (hereafter referred to as the EPA method), and the International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM) occupational health risk assessment model (hereafter referred to as the ICMM method)-each have specific applicable scenarios and limitations. No single method can achieve precise risk grading and dynamic management. Objective: To construct a novel occupational health risk grading method that integrates the strengths of four mainstream methods, based on a risk matrix and dynamic weighting, and to validate its applicability using footwear manufacturing enterprises as a case study. Methods: Four footwear manufacturing enterprises (A, B, C, D) were selected, and on-site measurements of chemical toxicants, dust, and noise in the workplace were conducted. Risk assessments were performed using the MOM method, the exposure ratio method, the EPA method, and the ICMM method. A risk ratio normalization approach was applied to align the risk levels from all methods into a unified five-level system. On this basis, a risk matrix was constructed, and a combined weighting approach integrating the entropy weight method and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was employed to determine the dynamic weights of each method under different hazard scenarios. A comprehensive risk index (CRI) was constructed and graded. Consistency among methods was analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation, weighted Kappa coefficient, Fleiss' Kappa coefficient, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: Maximum benzene concentrations reached 3.41 mg/m Conclusion: The constructed grading and classification method can more objectively and comprehensively reflect the actual occupational health risks in footwear manufacturing enterprises, providing a scientific basis for formulating differentiated and precise management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.