Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42756558›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026

Integrating artificial intelligence across the cancer drug discovery pipeline using a design-test-refine workflow.

Jinming Bai, Jessica Sarah Faure, Tawfeeq Ahmed Khalfe, Rongqin Huang, Carly Ann Burmeister, Annick van Niekerk, Sharon Prince

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jinming BaiDivision of Cell Biology, Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Jessica Sarah FaureDivision of Cell Biology, Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Tawfeeq Ahmed KhalfeDivision of Cell Biology, Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Rongqin HuangSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Key Laboratory of Smart Drug Delivery (Ministry of Education), National Key Laboratory of Advanced Drug Formulations for Overcoming Delivery Barriers, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Carly Ann BurmeisterDivision of Cell Biology, Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Annick van NiekerkDivision of Cell Biology, Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Sharon PrinceDivision of Cell Biology, Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence-driven drug design (AIDD) is increasingly transforming cancer drug discovery, but its applications are often considered as individual computational tasks rather than interconnected stages of the drug discovery pipeline. This mini-review addresses this gap by firstly identifying the following four interconnected stages of anticancer drug development (1) target identification and biomarker-guided prioritization (2), structure-based and generative molecular design (3), perturbational mechanism-of-action assessment, and (4) drug response, resistance, and combination prioritization. It, secondly, describes how AI can be integrated across these four stages in a design-test-refine workflow where AI-generated predictions are progressively evaluated and refined through experimental and patient-relevant evidence. We emphasize that the role of AI in predicting target dependency, molecular activity, mechanism-of-action, or drug response should be to guide rather than replace experimental discovery or clinical judgment. Key limitations to the application of AIDD in cancer are highlighted, including in training and benchmarking data, in accounting for biological heterogeneity, as well as in model generalization. Importantly, robust validation across increasingly complex cancer models is required and it is proposed that AIDD should be used to prioritize testable treatment predictions. Ultimately, translationally useful AIDD workflows should move beyond isolated predictions toward iterative, biologically informed therapeutic development, to form a holistic design-test-refine workflow.

Indexed as

AI-driven drug designbiomarker identificationcancer therapeuticscombination therapydrug response predictiongenerative molecular designperturbational transcriptomicstarget discovery

Identifiers

PMID42756558
PMCPMC13583913

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.