Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42757225›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2026

Comparative Evaluation of Push-Out Bond Strength Between CAD/CAM-Milled and Anatomically Customized Fiber Posts: An In Vitro Study.

Camila Orlinda Andrade Gusmão, Vanessa Inácio Celestrino, Franciele Floriani, Amirali Zandinejad, Carlos Alberto Jurado, Washignton Steagall, Rubens Nisie Tango, Alfredo Mikail Melo Mesquita

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Camila Orlinda Andrade GusmãoMaster in Prosthodontics, Universidade Paulista (UNIP), São Paulo, Brazil, unip.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5418-8012
Vanessa Inácio CelestrinoMaster in Prosthodontics, Universidade Paulista (UNIP), São Paulo, Brazil, unip.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4711-3723
Franciele FlorianiDepartment of Prosthodontics, University of IOWA, Iowa City, Iowa, USA, uiowa.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7237-4886
Amirali ZandinejadDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, New York, USA, rochester.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8970-9611
Carlos Alberto JuradoSchool of Dental Medicine, Ponce Health Sciences University, Ponce, Puerto Rico, USA, psm.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7437-4855
Washignton SteagallDepartment Head at Restorative Dentistry, Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), São Paulo, Brazil, uninove.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8135-9570
Rubens Nisie TangoDepartment of Prosthodontics, ICT/SJC, UNESP, São José dos Campos, Brazil, unesp.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0946-1826
Alfredo Mikail Melo MesquitaMaster in Prosthodontics, Universidade Paulista (UNIP), São Paulo, Brazil, unip.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4273-1448

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This in vitro study evaluated the push-out bond strength of two types of intraradicular fiber posts: conventional customized anatomical posts and milled fiber posts, cemented with two different strategies. Methods and Materials: Sixty bovine incisors with roots sectioned at the cementoenamel junction and standardized to a length of 15 mm were endodontically treated. All specimens were randomly assigned to four groups ( Results: CAD/CAM-milled posts (G3 and G4) exhibited significantly higher bond strength (mean PBS = 13.1 ± 3.9 MPa) compared to customized anatomical posts (G1 and G2) (mean PBS = 9.7 ± 2.8 MPa) ( Conclusion: CAD/CAM-milled fiber posts demonstrated higher push-out bond strength than customized anatomical posts, regardless of the cementation strategy. However, these groups also exhibited a greater frequency of catastrophic failures, indicating that higher bond strength should not be interpreted as overall clinical superiority. Additional studies are needed to determine the clinical significance of these findings.

Indexed as

bond strengthmilleduniversal resin cement

Identifiers

PMID42757225
PMCPMC13584754

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.