Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42757242›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026

Transfer effects of animal-assisted therapy on socioemotional skills in adult inpatient rehabilitation after acquired brain injury: a randomized controlled trial.

Elena Pauli, Sophie Dubach, Carmina Haase, Anna Haefeli, Margret Hund-Georgiadis, Jan Hattendorf, Karin Hediger

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03687671 (Long-term Effects on Socioemotional Skills of Animal-assisted Therapy in Patients With Acquired Brain Injury), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03687671 nacompletednot on this map

Long-term Effects on Socioemotional Skills of Animal-assisted Therapy in Patients With Acquired Brain Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorSwiss Tropical & Public Health InstituteRan2018 to 2024Enrolled70ConditionsAcquired Brain InjuryArmsAnimal-assisted therapy, Treatment as usual
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elena PauliFaculty of Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Sophie DubachFaculty of Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Carmina HaaseFaculty of Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Anna HaefeliFaculty of Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Margret Hund-GeorgiadisClinic for Neurorehabilitation and Paraplegiology, REHAB Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Jan HattendorfBiostatistics and Data Management, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Karin HedigerFaculty of Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: People with acquired brain injury (ABI) often experience difficulties in social and emotional functioning, potentially affecting recovery and quality of life. Animal-assisted therapy (AAT) is increasingly used in rehabilitation to support socioemotional functioning. Objective: This randomized controlled trial investigated whether the effects of AAT extend beyond therapy sessions in patients with ABI undergoing inpatient neurorehabilitation. We hypothesized that patients receiving AAT would demonstrate greater improvements in socioemotional skills compared to those receiving standard care. Methods: Over 6 weeks, participants received two weekly sessions of occupational, speech, or physiotherapy with or without animals. The primary outcomes were social behavior and positive and negative emotions assessed via behavioral analyses in a standardized social situation. The secondary outcomes included depression, social cognition, therapy motivation, quality of life, and therapy adherence. The outcomes were evaluated at baseline, post-intervention, and 6- and 12-week follow-ups. Due to substantial attrition, the preregistered primary endpoint at 12-week follow-up could not be analyzed as planned. Therefore, analyses focused on post-assessment outcomes and were exploratory. Linear regression models were used to estimate mean differences. Results: Seventy patients with ABI ( Conclusion: Given the exploratory analyses following protocol deviation, these findings provide preliminary evidence that AAT may improve social behavior beyond therapy sessions in adult patients with ABI undergoing inpatient rehabilitation. Further studies are needed to evaluate the durability and real-world relevance of this effect. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03687671.

Indexed as

acquired brain injuryanimal-assisted therapyneurorehabilitationrandomized controlled trialsocial behaviorsocioemotional functioning

Identifiers

PMID42757242
PMCPMC13584825

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.