Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42757729›Full record

SynthesisEndocrinology, diabetes & metabolism2026

Efficacy of Oral Dextrose Gel for Neonatal Hypoglycaemia: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With 4368 Patients.

Rowa Tareq Al-Enezi, Fatmah A Alshebeeb, Julia Rose Panikulam, Dana B AlKhaldi, Rawan B Almutairi, Riyam Tareq Alenezi, Anwar M Aljassar, Raghad B Aldosari, Fajer Ali Alkandari, Amnah A Dashti and 3 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Rowa Tareq Al-EneziKuwait Institute for Medical Specializations, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Fatmah A AlshebeebKuwait Institute for Medical Specializations, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Julia Rose PanikulamTbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi, Georgia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3429-6061
Dana B AlKhaldiKuwait Institute for Medical Specializations, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Rawan B AlmutairiKuwait Institute for Medical Specializations, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Riyam Tareq AleneziFaculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8798-272X
Anwar M AljassarFaculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Raghad B AldosariFaculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Fajer Ali AlkandariKuwait Institute for Medical Specializations, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Amnah A DashtiFaculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Khadeja A AldhahiKuwait Institute for Medical Specializations, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Hamza A Abdul-HafezFaculty of Medicine, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6089-240X
Abdullah M AlharranCollege of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Kingdom of Bahrain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2337-6588

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeonatal hypoglycaemia is a common metabolic disorder affecting up to 15% of healthy neonates and a higher proportion of at-risk infants. Oral 40% dextrose gel has emerged as a promising, low-cost intervention, but recent evidence remains inconsistent. This updated meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of 40% oral dextrose gel for preventing and treating neonatal hypoglycaemia.

methodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and the Cochrane Library from inception to March 2026 for randomized controlled trials evaluating 40% oral dextrose gel in neonates at risk for or with confirmed hypoglycaemia. The primary outcome was hypoglycaemia. We used R software (version 4.5.0) for the analysis.

resultsEight RCTs comprising 4368 neonates were included. Dextrose gel did not significantly reduce hypoglycaemia, treatment success, recurrent hypoglycaemia, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, breastfeeding at discharge or formula feeding. Sensitivity analysis excluding Harding et al. (2021) for NICU admission yielded a statistically significant 24% reduction. Trim-and-fill adjustment for recurrent hypoglycaemia and formula feeding did not alter conclusions.

conclusionsCurrent evidence did not demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in overall hypoglycaemia, treatment failure, recurrent hypoglycaemia, NICU admission or breastfeeding interruption after administration of oral 40% dextrose compared with control. While safe and low-cost, current evidence does not support routine use as a standalone intervention. Heterogeneity across protocols and populations warrants standardization in future trials.

trial registrationPROSPERO registration number: CRD420261368171.

Indexed as

GlucoseHypoglycemiaAdministration, OralGelsHumansInfant, NewbornRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeGelsGlucosedextrose gelmeta‐analysisneonatal hypoglycaemianewbornNICU admission

Identifiers

PMID42757729
PMCPMC13587362

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.