ArticlePloS one2026
Antifouling properties of ZnO nanorods coating on micropatterned polymers.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biofouling remains a major challenge for submerged materials in marine and industrial environments, reducing performance and increasing maintenance costs. In this study, zinc oxide nanorod (ZnO NR) coatings with dual-scale surface roughness were fabricated on three distinct 3D micropatterned surfaces, designated as D1, D2, and D3. The antifouling performance of the engineered surfaces was evaluated against the bacterium Escherichia coli and the diatom Amphora sp. under laboratory flow conditions, while acute toxicity was assessed using larvae of Litopenaeus vannamei. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy confirmed the presence of Zn-O stretching vibrations, particularly on the ZnO NR-coated D2 and D3 surfaces. Water contact angle measurements showed that the ZnO NR-coated surfaces were superhydrophobic (≈150-165°) because of their hierarchical micro/nanostructures, whereas the non-coated surfaces exhibited moderate wettability (≈80-90°). ZnO coating reduced bacterial attachment by 60.3%, 48.8%, and 5.8% on the D1, D2, and D3 surfaces, respectively. Diatom coverage was reduced by 9.9%, 72.9%, and 71.8% on the corresponding ZnO-coated surfaces. The enhanced antifouling performance was associated with the combined effects of Zn2+ ions, ROS generation, surface wettability, and micro/nanotopography. The non-coated D1 and D2 surfaces, together with the ZnO-coated D1 surface, exhibited no significant toxicity toward shrimp larvae. In contrast, the ZnO-coated D3 surface exhibited relatively low antifouling performance and higher larval toxicity. Among the tested surfaces, the ZnO-coated D1 micropattern demonstrated the best overall performance by combining high antifouling efficacy with low toxicity. Post-characterization SEM analysis confirmed that the ZnO nanorod coatings remained structurally intact after biological testing, indicating good coating stability under the experimental conditions. These findings demonstrate that combining ZnO nanorod coatings with micropatterned surface topography is a promising strategy for antifouling applications. However, further long-term field evaluations and comprehensive ecotoxicological studies are required to assess the environmental performance of these coatings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.