SynthesisPloS one2026
Using the Social Ecological Model to identify barriers to accessing and using primary healthcare services by the rural Bangladeshi elderly: A systematic review.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBangladesh's government is focusing on the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 3 to improve primary healthcare (PHC) services, although rural elderly populations still lack access. The systematic review aimed at exploring and synthesizing the multilevel barriers to accessing and using PHC services by the rural Bangladeshi elderly based on the Social Ecological Model (SEM).
methodAfter completing registration in PROSPERO, electronic searches were conducted in March 2026 for a systematic literature search in the Scopus, PubMed, and ProQuest Sociological Abstracts databases, as well as in Google and Google Scholar. After a rigorous search, this review included 19 of 2099 articles, following the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the review. The quality of the articles was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme and Mixed Methods Appraisal Tools. Barriers were identified using the thematic synthesis approach guided by the SEM.
resultsThe 19 included articles were synthesized into five themes: individual, family, organizational, social and community, and policy barriers. The review findings revealed that the key individual-level barriers included less physical capability, financial insolvency, and lack of PHC service knowledge. The family-level barriers included less connectivity with family and relatives, family influence over healthcare decisions, and gender disparity in families. The organizational-level barriers incorporated limited infrastructural facilities, unsatisfactory attitudes of healthcare providers (HPs), preference for gender-specific HPs, and treatment expenses. Dependence on traditional healers and lack of mobility were the social and community-level barriers. Finally, the policy-level barriers included rural elderly health insurance gaps.
conclusionThe review recommends PHC awareness campaigns, family support, simplification of PHC service-related facilities, social assistance, and health coverage programs to help rural Bangladeshi elderly access PHC services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.