ReviewProtoplasma2026
Cytorrhysis under drought, osmotic and freezing stress.
Review in Protoplasma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cytorrhysis describes the shrinkage of plant cells caused by water loss, during which the protoplast and cell wall contract while remaining connected. Cytorrhysis can occur naturally during drought and freezing and can be experimentally induced by exposure to osmotic substances. Although traditionally studied separately, the cytorrhysis process itself shares the same underlying mechanisms: water efflux along chemical potential gradients and the mechanical response of the cell wall-plasma membrane continuum. Cytorrhysis has been documented across diverse taxa - including algae, bryophytes, ferns and seed plants - indicating that it represents a fundamental response of walled cells to dehydration. Besides osmotic effects, the extent of cytorrhysis is also strongly affected by biomechanical cell structure. Cell size, wall thickness, elasticity and tissue architecture influence the likelihood of cellular collapse. Small, thick-walled cells withstand larger pressure differences and develop negative turgor pressure whereas large, thin-walled cells collapse more readily. During freezing, extracellular ice imposes temperature-dependent dehydration forces, and biomechanical constraints may generate negative turgor pressure. Recent advances, including cryo-microscopy, differential scanning calorimetry and psychrometric water-potential measurements, allow more precise quantification of freeze dehydration and structural responses. Functionally, cytorrhysis can be protective or damaging. Moderate, reversible cytorrhysis helps maintain membrane integrity e.g. in desiccation-tolerant species. In freezing environments, cells undergoing cytorrhysis survive temperatures far below those tolerated by supercooling cells. However, excessive dehydration may cause cell death. Integrating classical observations with modern biophysical approaches provides a renewed perspective on cytorrhysis and highlights structural traits that could be exploited to enhance plant resilience to drought and freezing stress in a changing climate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42760415What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.