Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42760415›Full record

ReviewProtoplasma2026

Cytorrhysis under drought, osmotic and freezing stress.

Matthias Stegner, Karin Fehringer, Alexander Flörl, Anna-Lena Strasser, Jasmin Lindner, Sandra Plangger, Tanja Schäfernolte, Viktoria Thoma, Gilbert Neuner, Ingeborg Lang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Protoplasma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Matthias StegnerDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Biology, University of Innsbruck, Sternwartestraße 15, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria. Matthias.stegner@uibk.ac.at.
Karin FehringerDepartment of Functional and Evolutionary Ecology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Djerassiplatz 1, A-1030, Vienna, Austria.
Alexander FlörlDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Biology, University of Innsbruck, Sternwartestraße 15, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Anna-Lena StrasserDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Biology, University of Innsbruck, Sternwartestraße 15, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Jasmin LindnerDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Biology, University of Innsbruck, Sternwartestraße 15, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Sandra PlanggerDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Biology, University of Innsbruck, Sternwartestraße 15, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Tanja SchäfernolteDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Biology, University of Innsbruck, Sternwartestraße 15, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Viktoria ThomaDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Biology, University of Innsbruck, Sternwartestraße 15, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Gilbert NeunerDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Biology, University of Innsbruck, Sternwartestraße 15, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Ingeborg LangDepartment of Functional and Evolutionary Ecology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Djerassiplatz 1, A-1030, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cytorrhysis describes the shrinkage of plant cells caused by water loss, during which the protoplast and cell wall contract while remaining connected. Cytorrhysis can occur naturally during drought and freezing and can be experimentally induced by exposure to osmotic substances. Although traditionally studied separately, the cytorrhysis process itself shares the same underlying mechanisms: water efflux along chemical potential gradients and the mechanical response of the cell wall-plasma membrane continuum. Cytorrhysis has been documented across diverse taxa - including algae, bryophytes, ferns and seed plants - indicating that it represents a fundamental response of walled cells to dehydration. Besides osmotic effects, the extent of cytorrhysis is also strongly affected by biomechanical cell structure. Cell size, wall thickness, elasticity and tissue architecture influence the likelihood of cellular collapse. Small, thick-walled cells withstand larger pressure differences and develop negative turgor pressure whereas large, thin-walled cells collapse more readily. During freezing, extracellular ice imposes temperature-dependent dehydration forces, and biomechanical constraints may generate negative turgor pressure. Recent advances, including cryo-microscopy, differential scanning calorimetry and psychrometric water-potential measurements, allow more precise quantification of freeze dehydration and structural responses. Functionally, cytorrhysis can be protective or damaging. Moderate, reversible cytorrhysis helps maintain membrane integrity e.g. in desiccation-tolerant species. In freezing environments, cells undergoing cytorrhysis survive temperatures far below those tolerated by supercooling cells. However, excessive dehydration may cause cell death. Integrating classical observations with modern biophysical approaches provides a renewed perspective on cytorrhysis and highlights structural traits that could be exploited to enhance plant resilience to drought and freezing stress in a changing climate.

Indexed as

DehydrationDrought stressExtracellular iceFreezing stressOsmotic stressPlasmolysis

Identifiers

PMID42760415

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.