ArticleBMC gastroenterology2026
Leucine-rich alpha-2 glycoprotein as a predictor of primary non-response to anti-TNF-α therapy in biologic-naïve Egyptian IBD patients.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnti-tumor necrosis factor-α (anti-TNF-α) agents are a cornerstone in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapy, yet primary non-response remains a significant practical challenge. Leucine-rich alpha-2 glycoprotein (LRG) has been recognized as a promising marker for disease activity. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive significance of pre-treatment serum LRG for response to anti-TNF-α therapy in biologic-naïve Egyptian IBD patients.
methodsIn this prospective cohort study, 100 biologic-naïve IBD adult patients (50 Crohn's disease [CD], 50 ulcerative colitis [UC]) and 100 healthy controls were enrolled. Patients received induction therapy with adalimumab or infliximab. Clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic evaluations were conducted at baseline and at week 24. Response was defined by clinical indices and endoscopic improvement, while biochemical normalization was evaluated as a secondary, supportive parameter.
resultsIBD patients had significantly elevated baseline LRG levels compared to the healthy controls (p < 0.001). Responders' baseline LRG was substantially lower than that of non-responders in both UC (26.53 vs. 34.88 µg/mL; p = 0.008) and CD (26.03 vs. 35.07 µg/mL; p = 0.006). Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed a cut-off of > 29 µg/mL for predicting non-response, yielding sensitivities of 74.2% and 80.0% with specificities of 69.57% and 65.71% for UC and CD, respectively and negative predictive values of 85.7% for UC and 88.5% for CD. Multivariate regression confirmed baseline LRG as an independent predictor of non-response.
conclusionsBaseline serum LRG levels > 29 µg/mL demonstrated moderate discriminatory ability for predicting primary non-response to anti-TNF-α therapy in Egyptian IBD patients. LRG may serve as a useful adjunctive biomarker for pre-treatment risk estimation and recognizing patients who may require alternative therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.