ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim: Methods: The study was conducted using a cross-sectional descriptive design, focusing on Saudi residents in different locations who are at least 18 years old. Informed consent was obtained, and ethical approval of the study was granted by Taif University. An online self-administered questionnaire that underwent expert validation and a pilot study to ensure clarity and reliability was distributed via social media platforms to collect data. The IBM SPSS version 25 was used for statistical analyses, applying both descriptive and inferential approaches at a significance level of Results: A total of 1,482 participants were included in this study. The findings indicated low knowledge and moderate attitude and practice levels, with mean scores of 55.5, 64.2, and 66.7% for knowledge, attitudes and practices, respectively. Several knowledge gaps were identified, particularly regarding treatment, where a considerable proportion of the participants incorrectly believed that antibiotics or antacids alone are sufficient for treatment (48.4 and 45.3%, respectively). Participants generally demonstrated positive attitudes, while practices showed some inappropriate behaviors, including self-medication and early discontinuation of antibiotics. Significant associations were observed between KAP domains and several sociodemographic factors. Conclusion: This study underscores the need to improve the KAP regarding
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.