ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026
Adverse event reporting signals for SGLT-2 inhibitor-metformin combination therapy: a disproportionality analysis of the FAERS database.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the real-world safety profile of combination therapy with a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT-2i) and metformin relative to monotherapy, utilizing the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Methods: We extracted adverse event (AE) reports from the FAERS database from the first quarter (Q1) of 2013 to the fourth quarter (Q4) of 2025 in which the combined regimen (ertugliflozin, dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, or canagliflozin plus metformin) was designated as the primary suspect. Disproportionality analyses were performed using the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS) algorithms. Additionally, we examined the time-to-onset distribution and the clinical outcomes of the documented AEs. Results: A total of 23,407 combination-therapy reports were included. At the System Organ Class (SOC) level, ROR-based signal detection identified pronounced disproportionalities in metabolism and nutrition disorders (ROR = 9.00), renal and urinary disorders (ROR = 3.91), reproductive system and breast disorders (ROR = 2.59), and infections and infestations (ROR = 2.49). At the Preferred Term (PT) level, the five most frequently reported events cross-validated by all four algorithms were diabetic ketoacidosis (n = 3,522), weight decreased (n = 1,294), blood glucose increased (n = 1,226), acute kidney injury (n = 1,153), and euglycaemic diabetic ketoacidosis (euDKA, n = 1,114). Notably, euDKA demonstrated the highest signal intensity (ROR = 335.43), with the point estimate for the combination group being numerically higher than that observed for SGLT-2i monotherapy (ROR = 185.24). Regarding documented outcomes, hospitalisation or prolonged hospitalisation constituted the most prevalent serious outcome (33.7%), followed by life-threatening events (7.6%) and death (2.7%). In the sub-cohort with definitive time-to-onset data, 39.56% of AEs occurred within the first 30 days following treatment initiation. Conclusion: This pharmacovigilance analysis of the FAERS database detected significant disproportionality signals for SGLT-2i/metformin combination therapy, particularly within metabolic/nutritional, renal/urinary, and infectious disease categories. The euDKA signal appeared prominent in descriptive comparisons. The predominance of hospitalisation-related events, coupled with the substantial concentration of AEs within the initial 30-day window, highlights the early treatment phase as a potentially critical monitoring period. These exploratory findings warrant rigorous validation through prospective cohort studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.