ReviewInnovations in clinical neuroscience
Managing Sensory Impairments and Communication Differences in Psychotic Disorders.
Review in Innovations in clinical neuroscience. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sensory impairments, including visual and auditory loss, are common across the lifespan and are increasingly recognized as risk factors for psychiatric disorders, particularly psychosis. Evidence suggests that disruptions in sensory processing, multisensory integration, and self-other signal differentiation may contribute to cortical disorganization overlapping with mechanisms implicated in psychotic illness. The psychiatric consequences of sensory impairment are influenced by chronicity and timing of onset, with congenital vs acquired loss conferring differing risks and clinical presentations. Communication barriers represent a major source of morbidity and diagnostic error, often leading to misinterpretation of symptoms as psychosis, negative symptoms, or noncooperation. This article reviews current literature on the relationship between sensory impairment and psychosis and highlights critical gaps in clinical guidance. Through illustrative case vignettes, we demonstrate common diagnostic pitfalls and propose practical strategies for assessment, including ensuring adequate communication, adapting mental status examinations to patient limitations, and carefully evaluating hallucinations and mutism in the context of sensory loss. Attention to these factors is essential to avoid misdiagnosis, improve patient-clinician communication, and reduce healthcare disparities experienced by individuals with co-occurring sensory and psychiatric conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42762013PMC13588653What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.