Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42762013›Full record

ReviewInnovations in clinical neuroscience

Managing Sensory Impairments and Communication Differences in Psychotic Disorders.

Dominic Theodore, Nita Bhatt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Innovations in clinical neuroscience. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dominic TheodoreDr. Theodore is with Department of Psychiatry, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Nita BhattDr. Theodore is with Department of Psychiatry, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory impairments, including visual and auditory loss, are common across the lifespan and are increasingly recognized as risk factors for psychiatric disorders, particularly psychosis. Evidence suggests that disruptions in sensory processing, multisensory integration, and self-other signal differentiation may contribute to cortical disorganization overlapping with mechanisms implicated in psychotic illness. The psychiatric consequences of sensory impairment are influenced by chronicity and timing of onset, with congenital vs acquired loss conferring differing risks and clinical presentations. Communication barriers represent a major source of morbidity and diagnostic error, often leading to misinterpretation of symptoms as psychosis, negative symptoms, or noncooperation. This article reviews current literature on the relationship between sensory impairment and psychosis and highlights critical gaps in clinical guidance. Through illustrative case vignettes, we demonstrate common diagnostic pitfalls and propose practical strategies for assessment, including ensuring adequate communication, adapting mental status examinations to patient limitations, and carefully evaluating hallucinations and mutism in the context of sensory loss. Attention to these factors is essential to avoid misdiagnosis, improve patient-clinician communication, and reduce healthcare disparities experienced by individuals with co-occurring sensory and psychiatric conditions.

Indexed as

catatoniacommunication barriershallucinationshealthcare disparitieshearing lossmisdiagnosismultisensory integrationpsychosisSensory impairmentvisual impairment

Identifiers

PMID42762013
PMCPMC13588653

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.