ArticleJACC. Advances2026
Markers of Autonomic Function and Cancer Mortality Risk in Healthy Adults.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDysfunction of the autonomic nervous system increases cardiovascular risk, but its contribution to cancer outcomes is less well-characterized.
objectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate associations between physiological measures reflective of autonomic function and all-site and site-specific cancer mortality in healthy adults.
methodsThe study included 75,308 participants (26.8% women) in the Cooper Center Longitudinal Study who completed a preventive medicine examination with a treadmill test between 1971 and 2018. Gompertz mortality models estimated associations between autonomic markers-resting heart rate, heart rate reserve, systolic blood pressure response to exercise, and heart rate recovery-and cancer mortality through 2019. Analyses were sex-stratified when significant interactions were present. Models adjusted for age, clinical and lifestyle factors, and cardiorespiratory fitness.
resultsOver a median follow-up of 21.9 years, 3,855 cancer deaths occurred. Lower heart rate reserve (HR per 10% lower: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.02-1.07) and heart rate recovery at 5 minutes (HR per 10 beats/min lower: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.03-1.09) were associated with higher all-site cancer mortality. Sex-specific associations were observed for certain markers: A higher resting heart rate was related to higher cancer mortality in men (HR per 10 beats/min: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.01-1.08), but not in women, whereas systolic blood pressure response associations were stronger in women. Associations with site-specific cancer mortality were particularly pronounced for lung cancer.
conclusionsIn apparently healthy adults, multiple noninvasive markers of autonomic function were associated with cancer mortality, independent of cardiorespiratory fitness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.