SynthesisBMJ paediatrics open2026
Climate change health impacts on children in Canada: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMJ paediatrics open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClimate change is accelerating; however, effects on child health remain poorly understood. Countries need context-specific evidence to translate global knowledge into adaptation. Canada is warming faster than the global average and provides an informative case of paediatric climate risks.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review with narrative synthesis of the impacts of climate change on child health in Canada. Eligible studies explicitly attributed a change in a child health risk factor or exposure to climate change. Findings were narratively synthesised and study quality was appraised using design-appropriate tools.
resultsOf 3614 records identified, 54 original articles and 17 reviews were included. A Canada-specific framework linked rising temperatures, changes in precipitation, increased wildfires, alterations to ecosystems and the spread of vector-borne diseases with child health. These impacts appear to follow existing health inequities. Quality appraisal identified frequent concerns about representativeness and control of confounding in quantitative studies, while most reviews were judged at high risk of bias.
conclusionsEvidence increasingly demonstrates climate change impacts on child health in Canada, but knowledge gaps remain. The findings demonstrate that children remain vulnerable even in a high-income country when climate hazards interact with developmental needs, inequity, infrastructure and relationships to land. The framework offers a transferable approach for countries to identify locally important hazards, vulnerable groups and intervention points. Strengthened efforts are urgently needed to implement these interventions in order to protect the health of current and future generations of Canadian children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.