ReviewMolecular cancer2026
Immune-pressure redistribution in resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade: mechanisms, biomarkers, and therapeutic design.
Review in Molecular cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PD-1/PD-L1 blockade can produce durable tumor control, yet primary, adaptive, and acquired resistance remain common. Existing accounts often catalogue resistance by cellular compartment, obscuring the coordinated nature of tumor adaptation. Here, we introduce immune-pressure redistribution as a treatment-oriented framework that complements cancer immunoediting by asking where therapeutic immune pressure is diverted after checkpoint release. Resistance is organized into three coupled routes: transfer into tumor-intrinsic escape through antigen-presentation loss, interferon-response defects, oncogenic rewiring, and lineage plasticity; weakening through defective priming, terminal T-cell differentiation, compensatory checkpoints, metabolic constraint, and chronic cytokine signaling; and unloading into stromal, vascular, myeloid, regulatory, microbial, and systemic host compartments. We integrate clinically validated mechanisms with emerging evidence, including the temporal duality of interferon-JAK signaling, the role of tumor-draining lymph nodes in sustaining progenitor-exhausted T cells, and the limited translation of TIGIT, IDO1, TGF-β, and CSF-1R targeting. We further propose a biomarker-guided strategy that combines tumor visibility, immune-cell state, spatial architecture, systemic inflammation, and early treatment dynamics to identify the dominant resistance topology. This framework supports topology-matched combinations and adaptive sequencing rather than uniform escalation, with the aim of restoring productive immune pressure while limiting compensatory escape and toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.