ArticleBMC oral health2026
An exploratory patient-specific finite element study of temporomandibular joint stress distribution following mandibular setback surgery in two distinct clinical scenarios.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMandibular setback surgery is commonly performed to correct skeletal Class III malocclusion, but its effects on temporomandibular joint (TMJ) biomechanics remain unclear, particularly regarding different setback configurations. This pilot study aimed to explore patterns of TMJ stress distribution using two patient-specific finite element models representing distinct clinical scenarios of mandibular setback surgery.
methodsPreoperative and six-month postoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans from two female Class III patients undergoing either unilateral (6 mm) or bilateral (3 mm) mandibular setback were used to construct finite element models of the TMJ. Preoperative CBCT scans were obtained in maximum intercuspation before surgery, whereas postoperative CBCT scans were obtained six months after surgery in postoperative maximum intercuspation. Stress distributions in the mandibular condyle, articular disc, and glenoid fossa were analysed under standardised loading conditions. Maximum and minimum principal stresses were evaluated for osseous structures, while von Mises stress was assessed for the articular disc.
resultsBoth patients exhibited a postoperative reduction in stress magnitudes across TMJ components. Tensile and compressive stresses decreased variably among condyles and fossae, with von Mises stress reductions noted in articular discs, particularly in non-operated sides. Stress concentration regions differed between sides and patients, reflecting anatomical and surgical variability.
conclusionsThis patient-specific finite-element study offers preliminary insights into the distribution of stress in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) following mandibular setback surgery, examined across two distinct clinical scenarios. The results indicate that TMJ biomechanical responses may differ according to individual anatomical characteristics, surgical conditions, and the actual preoperative and postoperative occlusal relationships recorded on CBCT, including posterior open-bite characteristics in the postoperative models. Consequently, the observed stress changes should not be interpreted as representing the isolated biomechanical effects of mandibular setback surgery. Larger studies using validated models are required before broader clinical conclusions can be drawn.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.