ArticleStatistics in biosciences2026
Distributed quantile regression for big data with missing covariates.
Article in Statistics in biosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Data missing caused by non-response or drop-out appears routinely in modern medical studies. With the rapid development of information technology, medical data are becoming more and more massive in volume, and thus usually require distributed analysis in real-world applications, especially for cases where the data are collected from multiple centers or contain patient privacy. In this paper, we focus on developing efficient distributed algorithms to support quantile regression analysis in missing big data, which provides a powerful tool to model the skew and heterogeneous medical samples in reality, but currently remains a challenging issue. We employ the weighted quantile regression (WQR) technique to incorporate the missing information into the model and propose two two-stage distributed algorithms, IPW-ADMM and IPW-renewable, for efficient and privacy-preserving estimation of WQR. Both methods first estimate the missingness mechanism using a logistic model and then solve the WQR problem in a communication-efficient manner without sharing raw individual-level data. The IPW-ADMM algorithm parallelizes estimation using a multi-block alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM), reformulating the nonsmooth WQR objective into a set of local subproblems. The IPW-renewable algorithm adopts a sequential renewable estimation framework with the smoothing technique, making it suitable for streaming or incremental data settings. Simulation studies demonstrate that both proposed methods achieve estimation accuracy comparable to the classical centralized interior point (IP) method, while offering substantial computational speedups in distributed environments. An application to the UK Biobank dataset further illustrates their practical utility in detecting heterogeneous genetic associations across quantiles under covariate missingness. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s12561-026-09528-6.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.