ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026
User Needs for an Artificial Intelligence-Empowered Basic Activities of Daily Living Training System After Stroke: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To explore patients' and primary caregivers' willingness to use an artificial intelligence (AI)-empowered basic activities of daily living (BADL) training system and their needs, concerns, and expectations regarding the system. Patients and Methods: A descriptive qualitative study was conducted in the Department of Neurology at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fujian, China. Patients with poststroke hemiplegia and primary caregivers were recruited using purposive sampling. Semistructured, face-to-face interviews were conducted with 11 patients with poststroke hemiplegia and 13 primary caregivers to capture both patient and caregiver perspectives. Data were collected on participant-reported BADL difficulties, willingness to use the AI-empowered BADL training system, perceived needs and concerns, and expectations for system design. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Results: Four themes were identified: 1) BADL limitations created shared difficulties for patients and caregivers; 2) acceptance of the AI-empowered BADL training system depended on usefulness and functional fit; 3) participants expected low-barrier, understandable, and sustainable training support; and 4) the system was viewed as a supplement to professional rehabilitation and family caregiving. Conclusion: An AI-empowered BADL training system may be acceptable to patients with poststroke hemiplegia and their primary caregivers if it is safe, reliable, easy to use, and appropriate to patients' functional status. These findings may guide the future development of task-oriented AI-empowered BADL training systems that support patient-caregiver collaboration, safety assurance, sustained engagement, and human-AI collaboration in rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.