Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42764845›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Multimodal Pharmacologic Strategies for Chronic Cancer Pain: A Systematic Review.

Savannah Q Thirza, Amanda Squire, Richard Berman, Ashique Ahamed

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Savannah Q ThirzaSupportive Care, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, GBR.
Amanda SquireSupportive Care, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, GBR.
Richard BermanSupportive Care, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, GBR.
Ashique AhamedSupportive Care, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer pain remains inadequately controlled in some patients despite opioid therapy, particularly when neuropathic or mixed pain mechanisms are present. This systematic review evaluated the efficacy and safety of non-opioid or adjuvant analgesics used alongside opioids in adults with chronic cancer pain. MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched for English-language randomized controlled trials published from January 2010 to August 2025. Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2). Ten trials involving 1,344 participants were included. In one trial, duloxetine was associated with clinically meaningful pain-response rates, although its primary mean pain-score analysis was not statistically significant. Low-dose gabapentin plus imipramine reduced pain and rescue-morphine use. Pregabalin reduced the morphine dose required to maintain pain control in one crossover trial, while other pregabalin studies showed numerical or non-significant benefits. Neither nabiximols trial met its primary efficacy endpoint, and nefopam did not significantly improve pain response or morphine consumption. Risk of bias was low in two trials, raised some concerns in one, and was high in seven. Overall, the evidence remains heterogeneous and insufficient to support a standard multimodal pharmacological regimen. Selected antidepressant and gabapentinoid strategies, particularly in neuropathic cancer pain, may benefit selected patients.

Indexed as

adjuvant analgesicscancer painmultimodal analgesiaopioidssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42764845
PMCPMC13589828

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.