ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2026
Lipid Variability Predicts Long-Term Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in MINOCA: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study investigates the predictive value of long-term variability in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 254 consecutive MINOCA patients (80 with MACEs, 174 without) were analyzed over a median 41-month follow-up. Lipid variability (LV) was quantified using standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), and variability independent of the mean (VIM) from ≥ 3 measurements. The proportional hazards assumption was tested using Schoenfeld residuals. Collinearity among variability metrics was assessed via variance inflation factor (VIF), and separate Cox models were constructed for each metric to avoid multicollinearity. The independent association between LV and MACE risk was analyzed via multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models, adjusted for established clinical covariates including age, sex, BMI, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, baseline lipid levels, and statin use during follow-up. The predictive performance was evaluated with time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: MACE incidence was 31.5% during follow-up. While all variability metrics were higher in the MACE group ( Conclusion: In MINOCA, variability in HDL-C and long-term variability in Lp(a) independently predict MACE risk. Beyond achieving lipid targets, maintaining long-term stability may be clinically important, offering a novel perspective for risk stratification and personalized management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.