ReviewInternational journal of women's health2026
Microbiota-Host Interactions in Perimenopausal Syndrome: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies (Review).
Review in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Perimenopausal syndrome (PMS) is common, with more than 70% of perimenopausal women experiencing symptoms such as hot flashes and anxiety. As a key regulator of host physiology, the gut microbiota may play an important role in the pathogenesis of PMS. Objective: This review aimed to synthesize clinical and preclinical evidence on alterations in the gut microbiota during perimenopause, elucidate the potential mechanisms underlying host-microbiota interactions, and summarize and critically evaluate current therapeutic strategies targeting the gut microbiota. Methods: A targeted literature search of PubMed and Web of Science was conducted for relevant studies published through July 15, 2026. Search terms covered perimenopause, menopause, gut microbiota, estrobolome, gut-brain axis, metabolomics, female microbiome, ovarian function, probiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation. Human studies were prioritized, with high-quality animal and mechanistic studies included when clinical evidence was limited. Results: Few studies have directly examined women with PMS. Findings on gut microbial diversity and changes in specific taxa have been inconsistent across studies, and no reproducible pattern of gut dysbiosis specific to PMS has been established. Current evidence suggests that ovarian aging and fluctuations in sex hormones may reshape the gut microbial ecosystem. In turn, microbial enzymes and metabolites may interact bidirectionally with host endocrine changes by influencing the enterohepatic circulation of estrogens, immune and inflammatory responses, ovarian function, and gut-brain communication. Lifestyle interventions are supported by a relatively substantial body of evidence for symptom improvement, although whether their effects are mediated by the gut microbiota remains unclear. Certain strain-specific probiotics have shown preliminary clinical promise. However, evidence supporting prebiotics, synbiotics, traditional Chinese medicine, acupuncture, plant-derived products, and fecal microbiota transplantation is derived mainly from small clinical studies or preclinical experiments. By distinguishing direct clinical evidence from PMS populations from indirect evidence derived from other populations and experimental studies, this review reveals a central paradox in current research that strong biological plausibility coexists with insufficient clinical causal evidence. Conclusion: The gut microbiota may contribute to the pathogenesis and progression of PMS through the "gut microbiota-estrogen-ovary-immune-brain axis". However, current evidence primarily supports bidirectional associations and biological plausibility. Although microbiota-targeted interventions have potential therapeutic value, the available evidence remains insufficient to support their routine clinical use. Future research should include longitudinal cohort studies using standardized menopausal staging and multicenter randomized controlled trials. Confounding factors such as age, diet, medication use, and hormone therapy should be adequately controlled. Integrated analyses of multiple omics datasets should also be combined with mechanistic studies to establish the causal role and clinical translational potential of the gut microbiota.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.