Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42765102›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2026

Development and validation of a clinical risk score for early identification of sudden acquired retinal degeneration syndrome in dogs: A retrospective case-control study.

Pasinee Sakulchatwut, Natthanet Sritrakoon, Nuanwan Rujirekasuwan, Tikamporn Teekasang, Mananya Sakulchatwut, Sirirat Niyom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pasinee SakulchatwutOphthalmology Unit, Kasetsart University Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
Natthanet SritrakoonOphthalmology Unit, Kasetsart University Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
Nuanwan RujirekasuwanOphthalmology Unit, Kasetsart University Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
Tikamporn TeekasangOphthalmology Unit, Kasetsart University Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
Mananya SakulchatwutKasetsart University Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Ratchaburi 70120, Thailand.
Sirirat NiyomDepartment of Companion Animal Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: Sudden acquired retinal degeneration syndrome (SARDS) is an important cause of acute, irreversible blindness in dogs and is frequently accompanied by systemic clinical and biochemical abnormalities. Despite numerous studies describing the disease, no clinically applicable prediction tool has been developed to facilitate early recognition before electroretinographic confirmation. This study aimed to identify demographic, hematological, and biochemical factors associated with SARDS and to develop and internally validate a practical clinical risk score for early identification of affected dogs. Materials and Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted using medical records of dogs that underwent electroretinography between January 2018 and December 2023 at the Kasetsart University Veterinary Teaching Hospital in Thailand. Fifty-three dogs with electroretinography-confirmed SARDS were compared with 219 breed-frequency-matched cataract patients exhibiting normal electroretinographic responses. Demographic characteristics, complete blood count results, and serum biochemical parameters were analyzed. Variables associated with SARDS in univariable logistic regression (p < 0.20) were entered into multivariable logistic regression using a manual purposeful selection approach. Independent predictors were incorporated into a weighted clinical risk score. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC). Results: Dogs with SARDS exhibited significantly higher neutrophil counts, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, plasma protein concentration, alanine aminotransferase activity, creatinine concentration, and white blood cell counts than control dogs. Multivariable logistic regression identified elevated neutrophil count (odds ratio [OR] = 8.80; p < 0.001), elevated ALP activity (OR = 6.80; p < 0.001), and increased plasma protein concentration (OR = 3.94; p = 0.004) as independent predictors of SARDS. Based on optimal cutoff values (neutrophils ≥10,525 cells/µL, ALP ≥74 U/L, and plasma protein ≥7.3 g/dL), a weighted clinical risk score ranging from 0 to 5 points was developed. A threshold score of ≥3 demonstrated good discriminative ability, with an AuROC of 0.83 (95% confidence interval: 0.76-0.90), sensitivity of 74.47%, and specificity of 79.79%, outperforming each individual laboratory parameter. Conclusion: This study identified readily available hematological and biochemical variables that are independently associated with SARDS and developed the first weighted clinical risk score for early identification of the disease in dogs. The proposed model demonstrated good diagnostic performance and may assist veterinarians in prioritizing dogs for ophthalmic evaluation and electroretinography. Although external validation in independent populations is warranted, this practical scoring system represents a valuable adjunct for improving early clinical suspicion and diagnostic decision-making in canine SARDS.

Indexed as

alkaline phosphataseclinical prediction modeldogselectroretinographyhematologyrisk factorssudden acquired retinal degeneration syndrome

Identifiers

PMID42765102
PMCPMC13590187

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.