Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42765129›Full record

ArticleBJU international2026

Impact of operative time on complications after PCNL in the elderly (aged ≥70 years): the Safety and Efficacy of Nephrolithotomy in Older patients undergoing PCNL (SENIOR-PCNL) study.

Łukasz Nowak, Wojciech Krajewski, Bhaskar Somani, Tomasz Szydełko, Vineet Gauhar, Steffi Kar Kei Yuen, Matthias Boeykens, Thomas Tailly, Ioannis Mykoniatis, Alba Sierra and 32 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BJU international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

42 authors.

Łukasz NowakDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Centre of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4273-8196
Wojciech KrajewskiDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Centre of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Bhaskar SomaniDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6248-6478
Tomasz SzydełkoDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Centre of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Vineet GauharDepartment of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3740-7141
Steffi Kar Kei YuenS.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9956-1558
Matthias BoeykensDepartment of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4950-0917
Thomas TaillyDepartment of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5801-5801
Ioannis MykoniatisFirst Department of Urology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Alba SierraDepartment of Urology, Hospital Clinic-University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2474-8067
Emre T SenerDepartment of Urology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0085-7680
Vincent De ConinckDepartment of Urology, AZ Klina, Brasschaat, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4983-5055
Rifat Burak ErgulDepartment of Urology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6262-9582
Alberto OliveroDepartment of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8703-9597
Lazaros TzelvesSecond Department of Urology, Sismanogleio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4619-9783
Francesco EspertoDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Angelis PeteinarisDepartment of Urology, University of Patras Hospital, Patras, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0427-4506
Yuigi YuminagaDepartment of Urology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9255-5908
Qi HouDepartment of Urology, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4597-7013
Patrick Juliebø-JonesDepartment of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4253-1283
Arman TsaturyanDepartment of Urology, Yerevan State Medical University, Yerevan, Armenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2499-7015
Bartosz MałkiewiczDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Centre of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Agata GóralDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Centre of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Paulina BiesiadeckaDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Centre of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Francisco Javier Lopez VivoDepartment of Urology, University Hospital del Vinalopó, Alicante, Spain.
Mantu GuptaDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8448-285X
Juan SernaDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Ziv SavinDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5012-7312
Anastasios AnastasiadisFirst Department of Urology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Dimitrios MemmosFirst Department of Urology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Charlotte SlotsDepartment of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Rita PagesDepartment of Urology, Hospital Clinic-University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Ceyhun OzdemirogluDepartment of Urology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Maria Florencia FrascheriDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Rafael Carrasco MorenoDepartment of Urology, University Hospital del Vinalopó, Alicante, Spain.
Eugenio VentimigliaDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3654-1629
Panagiotis KallidonisDepartment of Urology, University of Patras Hospital, Patras, Greece.
Evangelos LiatsikosDepartment of Urology, University of Patras Hospital, Patras, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5544-9636
Otas DurutovicClinic of Urology, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Amelia PietropaoloDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7631-3108
Begoña Ballesta MartinezDepartment of Urology, University Hospital del Vinalopó, Alicante, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8567-0545
YAU Working Group Endourology & Urolithiasis and the EAU Endourology Section

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the association between operative time (OT) and postoperative complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in elderly patients, and to identify a clinically meaningful OT threshold for risk stratification. PATIENTS AND

methodsA retrospective international multicentre study was performed including patients aged ≥70 years who underwent PCNL between January 2014 and February 2025 across 21 centres in 15 countries. Postoperative complications within 30 days were analysed as overall, major, and infectious events. The optimal OT threshold was determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, whereas the association between OT and postoperative outcomes was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression and adjusted restricted cubic spline models.

resultsAmong 716 patients, 120 (16.8%) developed postoperative complications; 49 (6.8%) had major and 49 (6.8%) infectious complications. ROC analysis identified a common OT threshold around 95 min. An OT ≥95 min was independently associated with overall complications (odds ratio [OR] 3.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.16-5.26), major complications (OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.35-5.10), and infectious complications (OR 3.79, 95% CI 1.90-7.57). The highest discriminative performance was observed for infectious complications (multivariable model area under the curve 0.77). Restricted cubic spline analysis confirmed significant non-linear associations between OT and all outcomes, with a steeper increase in adjusted complication probability beyond approximately 90-100 min. Non-papillary puncture was independently associated with all complication types, while positive preoperative urine culture predicted infectious complications.

conclusionsIn elderly patients undergoing PCNL, prolonged OT was independently associated with higher odds of overall, major, and infectious postoperative complications. The relationship was non-linear, with a clinically relevant threshold around 95 min, supporting OT as a practical intraoperative marker for risk stratification and procedural planning.

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiNephrolithotomy, PercutaneousOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesROC CurveTreatment Outcomecomplicationselderly patientsoperative timepercutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)risk stratification

Identifiers

PMID42765129
PMCPMC13655189

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.