ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
Mechanistic interpretability of fine-tuned protein language models for nanobody thermostability prediction.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationWhile Protein Language Models (PLMs) fine-tuned on biophysical data achieve high predictive accuracy, the physical principles underlying their predictions remain obscure. Deciphering these representations offers a unique opportunity to not only interpret model decisions but also to discover novel biophysical insights governing protein properties. Here, we present a framework using Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) to extract mechanistic knowledge from PLMs fine-tuned for nanobody thermostability.
resultsWe fine-tuned the ESM-2 model on the nanobody thermostability dataset, achieving superior performance compared to significantly larger state-of-the-art models. SAE analysis successfully decomposed the model's dense embeddings into sparse, interpretable features without loss of predictive accuracy. We characterized these features through both global and local analyses. Global analysis provided an aggregate map of position-dependent feature contributions, whereas local analysis identified specific residue-level patterns, including known determinants such as the VHH-tetrad and critical disulfide bonds, as well as candidate stabilizing residues. Free Energy Perturbation calculations supported the structural plausibility of selected residue-level hypotheses. These results show that SAE-based interpretation can generate testable, structurally grounded hypotheses for rational protein engineering. AVAILABILITY: The data and source code of the proposed method are available at GitHub (https://github.com/matsunagalab/paper_nanobody-thermostability-sae) and Zenodo (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18012027).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.