ArticleCartilage2026
Allogenic Platelet-Rich Plasma in Joint Pathologies: A Scoping Review of Basic Science and Clinical Outcomes.
Article in Cartilage, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveAllogenic platelet-rich plasma(PRP) has emerged as a promising alternative to autologous PRP for treating joint pathologies, offering potential advantages in consistency, cost, and applicability across patient demographics. This scoping review aims to firstly, examine the basic science of allogenic PRP and secondly, assess its clinical outcomes in joint diseases.DesignA scoping review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, encompassing studies from 2010 to 2025, across databases such as Embase, PubMed, and SCOPUS. The selection criteria included controlled laboratory studies, cohort studies, and randomised controlled trials focusing on the basic science, safety profile, and clinical outcomes of allogenic PRP.ResultsA total of 20 studies were included. In vivo and in vitro, allogenic PRP demonstrates anti-inflammatory and pro-regenerative properties. Clinically, it showed consistent patient-reported outcome improvements in the short term up to 6 months, significantly reducing VAS pain scores by up to 25% and improving joint function scores such as WOMAC, IKDC in knees and DASH and SPADI in shoulders. However, there is a lack of long-term superiority data. Clinician-reported outcomes, such as range of motion and imaging, were similarly improved; ultrasonography-detected effusion in knee OA improved and measured femoral cartilage thickness by 22%. The safety profile was generally favourable, with mild, transient adverse events and no severe complications reported.ConclusionsCurrent literature supports allogenic PRP as potentially effective and safe investigational therapy, but not as an established clinical treatment given the lack of standardisation and long-term superiority data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.