ArticlePloS one2026
Moderate gamma irradiation enhances the biostimulant activity of humic acid in tomato: Integrated effects on growth, physiology, yield, and fruit quality.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Humic acid is widely used as a plant biostimulant, but its effectiveness depends strongly on its physicochemical characteristics and application rate. Gamma irradiation may modify the structure and biological activity of humic substances, although its effects on horticultural crops remain insufficiently characterized. This study evaluated the effects of non-irradiated and gamma-irradiated humic acid on the growth, physiological performance, mineral nutrition, antioxidant status, yield, and fruit quality of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). The humic-acid treatments were arranged factorially using three irradiation doses-0, 2, and 5 kGy-and two application rates-2.5 and 5.0 kg ha-1-together with an untreated control. Gamma irradiation dose and humic acid application rate significantly affected most measured traits, whereas their interaction was significant only for total marketable yield. Humic acid irradiated at 2 kGy and applied at 5.0 kg ha-1 produced the greatest plant height, leaf area, root dry weight, chlorophyll index, net photosynthetic rate, leaf nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium concentrations, antioxidant activity, fruit number, marketable yield, total soluble solids, vitamin C, and lycopene content. Increasing the humic acid rate from 2.5 to 5.0 kg ha-1 significantly increased marketable yield when the humic acid was non-irradiated or irradiated at 2 kGy, but not when irradiated at 5 kGy. Treatment-adjusted correlation analysis linked canopy development and photosynthetic performance with fruit production and marketable yield, while days to first harvest was negatively associated with major growth and productivity traits. Hierarchical clustering and principal component analysis separated the treatment comprising humic acid irradiated at 2 kGy and applied at 5.0 kg ha-1 from the remaining treatments because of its consistently favorable multivariate profile. An ensemble multi-criteria decision-making framework integrating TOPSIS, VIKOR, WASPAS, and EDAS also ranked this treatment first under alternative criterion-weighting scenarios. These results indicate that moderate gamma irradiation can enhance humic acid biostimulant activity, whereas a higher irradiation dose may reduce the benefits obtained from increasing the application rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.