Bacterial chromosomal gene positioning is likely shaped by selection on both mean and growth-dependent expression.

In bacteria with circular chromosomes, genes near the replication origin (oriC) are replicated earlier and consequently attain higher copy numbers than genes near the terminus (ter), particularly during rapid growth. Hence, mutations altering a gene's chromosomal position can affect its expression level and be subject to selection. Two non-mutually exclusive hypotheses regarding the target of this selection have been proposed. The mean expression hypothesis (MEH) posits that the target is a gene's average expression across environments, whereas the growth-dependent expression hypothesis (GEH) proposes that the target is the growth dependence of gene expression, quantified by the expression slope-the change in expression level per unit change in growth rate. To test these hypotheses and assess their relative support, we analyze eight multi-environment protein expression datasets from three bacterial species, as well as Escherichia coli promoter strengths measured in two environments. Consistent with both MEH and GEH, we observe a significant decrease in both mean expression and expression slope from oriC to ter in six and four of the eight datasets, respectively. In regression models predicting gene position, the relative contributions of the two hypotheses differ across species. However, even when combined, the two hypotheses explain only a small fraction of chromosomal gene positioning, in part because the replication-dose effect is incompletely offset by compensatory evolution of individual promoter strengths. The positional gradients in mean and growth-dependent expression are disproportionately contributed by genes involved in translation and transcription. We conclude that patterns of bacterial chromosomal gene positioning are consistent with moderate effects of selection on both mean and growth-dependent expression.