ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2026
Clinical empathy and relational continuity mitigate care fragmentation for patients with multiple long-term conditions: a qualitative study.
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundServices for patients with multiple long-term conditions (MLTC) operate within fragmented and poorly coordinated systems but how care experiences, perceptions, and behaviours emerge and adapt in response to service changes and increasing system complexity is poorly understood.
aimTo explore how experiences and perceptions of care for patients with MLTC and their carers emerge and evolve within a complex adaptive care system to identify opportunities for better care. DESIGN AND
settingQualitative analysis of six focus groups with 28 patients with MLTC and carers in four Scottish integrated health and social care partnerships was undertaken.
methodData were collected between February and May 2024. Abductive analysis informed by a complex adaptive systems lens was used.
resultsCare for patients with MLTC emerged through dynamic, reciprocal interactions between patients, carers, professionals, and organisational structures. Service changes introduced to manage rising demand were often perceived as misaligned with patients' complex needs, prompting patients and carers to modify their behaviours to navigate access barriers. Care experiences were unpredictable, shaped by reinforcing feedback loops in which small personal interactions had a disproportionate effect on trust and engagement. Informal care expanded to fill system gaps, with family members assuming coordination and advocacy roles. Clinical empathy and relational continuity of care acted as key stabilising influences within fragmented care systems.
conclusionService changes intended to improve care efficiency can inadvertently destabilise care and shift the burden onto patients with MLTC and their carers, affecting perceived care quality and relational continuity. The quality of interactions and relationships between agents shape patients' perceptions of care and future engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.