ReviewNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
Pathway-specific mechanisms, therapeutic applications, and toxicodynamic profile of acriflavine in cancer: a comprehensive review.
Review in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acriflavine (ACF), a long-established antimicrobial acridine preparation, has re-emerged as a potential candidate for drug repurposing in oncology and antiviral therapy. Its biological activity has been associated with DNA intercalation, topoisomerase inhibition, modulation of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) signaling, and interference with selected viral and innate immune pathways. This review critically integrates current evidence on the chemical characteristics and synthetic approaches of ACF, its pharmacological mechanisms, preclinical anticancer activity, toxicodynamic profile, and emerging drug delivery strategies. Particular emphasis is placed on HIF-associated tumor adaptation, angiogenic and metabolic signaling, DNA-processing pathways, chemotherapy sensitization, and mechanisms relevant to therapeutic resistance. Nanoparticle, liposomal, hydrogel, and localized delivery systems are also evaluated for their potential to improve tissue exposure and reduce systemic toxicity. However, the translational evidence remains limited: quantitative human pharmacokinetic data are scarce, most anticancer efficacy data derive from in vitro and animal models, and intrinsic genotoxicity and nonspecific DNA interactions remain major safety concerns. Consequently, ACF should currently be regarded as a promising preclinical candidate for repurposing rather than a clinically validated anticancer therapy. Future development will require standardized formulations, rigorous human pharmacokinetic and safety studies, improved tumor-selective delivery, and prospective clinical evaluation to establish an acceptable therapeutic index.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42768202What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.