ArticleBMC proceedings2026
Elimination of HPV-associated cancers: universal HPV vaccination and the role of anal screening - a meeting report.
Article in BMC proceedings, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The HPV Prevention and Control Board convened its 18th technical meeting in Antwerp, Belgium (June 2025) to review the evidence on universal HPV vaccination and the role of anal cancer screening in the elimination of HPV-associated cancers. While HPV prevention has historically focused on cervical cancer in women, growing evidence supports extending both primary and secondary prevention to male cohorts and non-cervical anatomical sites. HPV causes approximately 148,072 cancer cases in men annually in the world - likely a substantial undercount - affecting primarily the oropharynx, anus, and penis. Men's lower seroconversion rates after natural HPV infection and sustained HPV prevalence across age groups makes vaccination an essential tool to prevent HPV-related disease in this population. Community-randomised trial evidence confirms that universal vaccination delivers stronger herd protection than girls-only strategies and may accelerate elimination of the most oncogenic types within 15-30 years. While modelling analyses identify high coverage in girls as the most efficient strategy for cervical cancer elimination, universal vaccination is justified on broader public health grounds, including equity, programme resilience, reduced vaccine hesitancy, and prevention of non-cervical cancers. Country experiences from Scotland and Cameroon highlight persistent equity gaps and the critical role of community engagement. Given the direct epidemiological link between HPV infection in males - particularly gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men and immunocompromised populations, such as people living with HIV - and anal cancer risk, the meeting identified anal cancer screening as the most advanced non-cervical secondary prevention strategy warranting immediate attention. The ANCHOR trial demonstrated that treating anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions reduces anal cancer incidence by 57%. Despite the publication of the first evidence-based U.S. Health and Human Services and International Anal Neoplasia Society guidelines in 2024, implementation remains constrained by high-resolution anoscopy capacity, workforce shortages, stigma, and limited evidence on optimal screening algorithms. The meeting concluded that integrating universal vaccination with targeted anal cancer screening - supported by equitable access, biomarker development, and living guidelines that evolve with emerging evidence - is essential to reducing HPV-related cancer burden in both women and men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.