ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2026
Predicting movement intensity through anthro-fitness profiling and its association with match outcomes in youth badminton: a logistic regression-based machine approach.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe fast-paced nature, coupled with the dynamic movement of badminton, renders movement intensity an essential indicator for success. In youth badminton, anthropometric attributes and fitness profile varies across players, yet little is known about the association of these indicators with competitive outcomes. In this study, we aim to classify movement intensity levels and examine the relationship between intensity classification and winning probability in youth badminton players.
methodsA total of 67 youth badminton players (mean age = 14.13 ± 1.67 years; badminton experience = 5.55 ± 2.05 years) drawn from different badminton programs in Malaysia participated in the study. Inertial measurement units were used to capture movement intensity during match play, while anthropometric, physiological and fitness evaluations were completed.
resultsK-means clustering grouped players into high and low movement intensities (HMI; LMI), respectively. The logistic regression model yielded an excellent performance in classifying the HMI and LMI with 97% accuracy. Feature importance analysis identified 11 essential predictors comprising velocity, agility, reaction time, core muscle endurance, height and weight as the most influential variables in differentiating intensity levels. Match outcome analysis revealed that HMI players had a winning probability of 68.4%, compared to 60.4% for LMI players.
conclusionThe ability for players to sustain higher movement intensity during match play is non-trivial for ensuring success in youth badminton. The application of machine learning in athlete profiling could assist coaches in enhancing training design and workload monitoring, leading to long-term success in youth badminton.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.