Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42768380›Full record

ArticleBiology of sex differences2026

Sex differences in face looking preferences at birth.

Yumnah T Khan, Alex Tsompanidis, Eden Hymanson, Sehanya Wickramanayake, Apex Consortium, Topun Austin, Carrie Allison, Simon Baron-Cohen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology of sex differences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yumnah T KhanAutism Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 8AH, UK. yk415@cam.ac.uk.
Alex TsompanidisAutism Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 8AH, UK.
Eden HymansonAutism Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 8AH, UK.
Sehanya WickramanayakeAutism Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 8AH, UK.
Apex ConsortiumAutism Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 8AH, UK.
Topun AustinNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Carrie AllisonAutism Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 8AH, UK.
Simon Baron-CohenAutism Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 8AH, UK.

Funding

Innovative Medicine Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking 777394NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre NIHR203312Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 214322\Z\18\Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While sex differences in behaviour have attracted considerable scientific interest, their underlying causes are complex and remain poorly understood. One approach to understand whether early biological factors might play a partial role is to study newborns, who have limited postnatal experiences. Previous research on neonatal sex differences is extremely limited, and studies that do exist have yielded mixed results, raised methodological concerns, and are yet to be replicated. To assess these gaps, the present study aimed to reevaluate sex differences in neonatal attention. 130 neonates (67 males, 63 females; mean age = 33 h) were presented with a video of a human face and a non-social object. When analysing percentage looking times, on average, females allocated a greater percentage of time looking at the face relative to males (d = 0.40). When analysing absolute looking times, females showed a preference for the face compared to the non-social object, while males showed no preference for either. However, no differences were observed between males' and females' absolute looking times for the face or object, indicating that sex differences are most prominent in the relative allocation of attention. Since sex differences in relative attentional patterns are present from the earliest days of life, one possible explanation for this effect may be due to contributions from prenatal factors (e.g., sex hormones). However, alternative explanations may be that these differences reflect general maturational differences between males and females or arise from low-level visual properties of the stimuli rather than their social versus non-social content.

Indexed as

AttentionFacial RecognitionSex CharacteristicsFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleAttentionGaze-trackingInfancyNeurodevelopmentSex differencesSocial cognition

Identifiers

PMID42768380
PMCPMC13591834

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.