ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2026
Spatial Treg niches and the therapeutic reprogramming of tumour tolerance in cancer.
Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regulatory T cells (Tregs) maintain immune homeostasis, but in cancer the same FOXP3-dependent programme can be co-opted to protect malignant tissue from immune elimination. This review critically synthesizes spatially resolved, single-cell and mechanistic evidence to determine when tumour-associated Tregs constitute active components of suppressive multicellular niches rather than merely correlates of immune exclusion. We integrate tumour-adapted regulatory states with anatomical positioning, neighbouring malignant and non-malignant cells, candidate suppressive mechanisms and upstream tumour-intrinsic, stromal and myeloid programmes. This framework distinguishes Treg-dominant suppressive niches from Treg-associated architectures in which regulatory-cell accumulation is secondary to other resistance mechanisms. We examine tumour nests, invasive margins, dendritic-cell and lymphoid aggregates, stromal and perivascular barriers, and hypoxic or metabolically constrained regions, assessing the strength of evidence linking each context to local immune restraint. We further consider how these niches emerge during tumour progression, change under therapeutic pressure, and persist, relocate or re-form during resistance. We evaluate selective depletion strategies targeting CCR8, CD25 and CTLA-4, together with functional reprogramming of TGF-β, adenosine, kynurenine, lactate, hypoxia and IL-2 pathways. Finally, we propose a tiered biomarker framework integrating Treg phenotype, transcriptional state, spatiotemporal topology, functional immune competence and longitudinal pharmacodynamic validation. The contribution of this Review is therefore not the niche concept itself, but its Treg-centred mechanistic and translational operationalization for identifying tumour-specific regulatory dependencies while preserving systemic self-tolerance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.