ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
AI information encounters and university students' digital burnout: the mediating role of cognitive flexibility and the moderating effect of AI learning trust.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has become an integral part of educational environments, where university students often encounter algorithm-recommended information unexpectedly, known as AI information encounters. Such interactions frequently lead to increased cognitive load, and it is unclear whether the ongoing depletion of these cognitive resources is statistically linked to digital burnout among university students. This study utilizes the Stimulus-Organism-Response (SOR) framework as its analytical foundation, employing cognitive load theory to elucidate the mediating role of cognitive flexibility, and social cognitive theory to explain the moderating role of AI learning trust, thereby constructing a moderated mediation model. A cross-sectional questionnaire survey, based on 566 valid responses, is conducted and analyzed using the PROCESS macro program (Model 4, 15) to examine mediation and moderated mediation effects. The results reveal that: (1) AI information encounters are significantly positively correlated with digital burnout; (2) cognitive flexibility partially mediates this relationship, as AI information encounters negatively correlate with cognitive flexibility, while cognitive flexibility negatively correlates with digital burnout; (3) AI learning trust negatively moderates the direct path between AI information encounters and digital burnout, meaning that higher levels of AI learning trust weaken their positive association; (4) AI learning trust also negatively moderates the link between cognitive flexibility and digital burnout, indicating that higher AI learning trust diminishes the negative association between cognitive flexibility and digital burnout. This study highlights the psychological costs associated with involuntary technology use and suggests that educators in higher education should be cognizant of the cognitive resource consumption resulting from AI information encounters, and the interactive effects of AI learning trust on this relationship. Additionally, educators should encourage students to develop reasonable AI learning trust and acknowledge the risk of digital burnout linked to AI information encounters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.