Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42769742›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2026

A trade-off between shelf-life mitigation and nutritional retention: a persistent challenge in pearl millet.

Nisha Singh, Kinjalben Suthar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nisha SinghGujarat Biotechnology University (GBU), Gandhinagar, India.
Kinjalben SutharGujarat Biotechnology University (GBU), Gandhinagar, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pearl millet serves as a vital cereal crop for ensuring food and nutritional security, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions known as "Grains of God," due to its remarkable tolerance to drought and other adverse environmental conditions. In addition to its climate resilience, pearl millet possesses superior nutritional quality, being enriched with essential amino acids, dietary fiber, iron, zinc, and several health-promoting bioactive compounds, thereby making it an important component of sustainable and nutritious food systems. However, a major limitation associated with the commercial utilization of pearl millet is its susceptibility to rancidity during storage. Rancidity primarily results from the oxidative degradation of lipids, leading to the formation of free fatty acids, hydroperoxides, aldehydes, and other volatile compounds responsible for undesirable off-flavors and reduced sensory acceptability. This deterioration is largely attributed to enzymatic reactions involving polyunsaturated fatty acids, which adversely affect the shelf life and consumer preference of pearl millet-based products. In addition to the limited long-term efficacy of conventional stabilization approaches, these strategies are often associated with nutrient loss, deterioration of quality attributes, reduced scalability, and increased processing costs. Recent advances in "Omics" approaches, such as genomics, transcriptomics, lipidomic, and metabolomics, have substantially enhanced our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying rancidity development in pearl millet. Several candidate genes, including

Indexed as

lipaseslipid oxidationomicspearl milletrancidityshelf life

Identifiers

PMID42769742
PMCPMC13591249

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.