ArticleBiomedical optics express2026
Optical characterization of a laser speckle contrast imaging system for intraoperative blood flow monitoring.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present the experimental characterization of a laser speckle contrast imaging system for blood flow monitoring under variable imaging conditions. A tissue phantom setup was used to evaluate system performance across multiple parameters, including laser power, exposure time, vessel depth, and flow velocity. Additionally, two optical configurations were tested to assess their robustness to the variation of these parameters: the conventional arrangement, where the camera is positioned perpendicular to the sample, and an alternative geometry, where the laser is perpendicular to the sample and the camera is placed at an angular offset. The latter was designed to facilitate future integration into multispectral or stereoscopic imaging setups. The analysis includes speckle contrast maps and a discriminability index to quantify the detectability of flow. Results obtained with the alternative configuration indicate that the system reliably detects blood flow across a range of conditions, although acquisition parameters significantly influence performance. A suitable range of laser power and exposure time was identified that enhances the flow detection through experimental selection of discriminability index values. Angular variation in the alternative configuration had a measurable effect; however, both configurations enabled reliable flow detection, opening the possibility of extending this approach to research toward scalable multi-camera imaging platforms.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.