ReviewInternational journal of preventive medicine2026
Anticoagulant Therapy in Coronary Artery Ectasia for the Prevention of Ischemic Heart Disease.
Review in International journal of preventive medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary artery ectasia (CAE) is a rare vascular anomaly characterized by abnormal dilation of coronary arteries. This predisposes patients to thrombotic events and ischemic heart disease (IHD) due to turbulent flow and stasis. While antiplatelet therapy has been the cornerstone of management, anticoagulants are increasingly advocated to mitigate thrombus formation in ectatic segments. We conducted a PRISMA compliant search of PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library up to 2025, using terms like "coronary artery ectasia," "anticoagulant therapy," and "ischemic heart disease." Included were peer reviewed studies comparing anticoagulants (warfarin or Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)) to antiplatelets in CAE patients, reporting IHD outcomes. Data extraction focused on study design, demographics, interventions, and endpoints; quality was assessed via Cochrane Risk of Bias and Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Random effects meta analysis calculated risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI); heterogeneity via I². Subgroups analyzed anticoagulant type and CAE etiology. 13 studies (n = 5,700 patients) were included. Anticoagulants reduced IHD risk (RR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.64 0.81;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.