ArticleInternational journal of preventive medicine2026
Integrating World Health Organization Package of Essential Noncommunicable Disease Interventions at Primary Health Care - An Impact Evaluation Study from a Mountainous State of India.
Article in International journal of preventive medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Noncommunicable diseases are the leading cause of death globally. This single-arm interventional (pretest-posttest) study was conducted in one rural and one tribal district of Himachal Pradesh. Persons with NCDs (cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus) reporting to outpatient departments were enrolled. Components of the World Health Organization Package of Essential Noncommunicable Disease (WHO-PEN) protocols 1 and 2 were used. Nonphysician health workers managed NCD patients, providing individualized counseling on behavioral risk factors of major NCDs. The counselling was conducted at baseline, three months, and six months from enrolment, using brief interventions based on the "5As" and "5Rs" models. Follow-up was done at baseline, three months, six months, and 12 months postenrollment to assess outcomes. Methods: Change of 10-year risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) using the WHO/International Society of Hypertension risk-assessment charts for SEAR and changes in behavioral and biological risk factors were compared to the baseline after one year of behavioral change intervention. Results: The 10-year CVD risk ≥20% decreased significantly from 17.9% at enrolment to 5.4% after one year of behavioral interventions. Significant improvements were seen in blood pressure, blood sugar control, and behavioral risk factors. Conclusions: Implementing the WHO-PEN protocols is feasible for managing NCDs at the primary healthcare level. Involving a health worker or counselor is essential for initiating and sustaining healthy behaviors and ensuring the individual's treatment compliance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.