ArticleTransplantation direct2026
Real-time Quality Assessment of Donor Kidneys During Normothermic Machine Perfusion Using Perfusate and Urinary Biomarkers.
Article in Transplantation direct, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Objective, real-time criteria for kidney graft quality during normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) are lacking, contributing to subjective acceptance decisions and organ discard. We evaluated real-time perfusate/urinary biomarkers and perfusion parameters during NMP and developed an exploratory predictive model for delayed graft function (DGF). Methods: This predefined secondary analysis used the NMP arm of a randomized trial (n = 41). Primary nonfunction cases (n = 3) were excluded a priori. The remaining immediate graft function/DGF cohort (n = 38) was split 70/30 into training and test sets; all screening and feature selection were restricted to the training set. Variables without missing data were grouped according to their correlation structure and physiological interpretability, and the feature with the largest absolute effect size within each group was selected. An L2-penalized logistic regression model was evaluated using cross-validation and a held-out test set (n = 12). Results: DGF occurred in 20 of 41 (49%) and primary nonfunction in 3 of 41 (7%) cases. In the training set (immediate graft function n = 12; DGF n = 14), DGF was associated with higher venous Po Conclusions: Lower urine output and higher venous Po
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.