Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42770911›Full record

ArticleActa dermato-venereologica2026

Diagnostic Accuracy of Dermoscopy for Spitzoid Tumours in Adults.

Nadia Vega, Sebastián Podlipnik, Daniel Morgado, Natalia Espinosa, Natalia Castrejon-de-Anta, Llucia Alòs, Josep Malvehy, Susana Puig, Cristina Carrera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nadia VegaUniversitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Dermatology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0009-0006-8549-1444
Sebastián PodlipnikUniversitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Dermatology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
Daniel MorgadoDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
Natalia EspinosaDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
Natalia Castrejon-de-AntaUniversitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Pathology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Llucia AlòsUniversitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Pathology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Josep MalvehyUniversitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Dermatology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain; Biomedical Research Networking Center on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain.
Susana PuigUniversitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Dermatology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain; Biomedical Research Networking Center on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain.
Cristina CarreraUniversitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Dermatology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain; Biomedical Research Networking Center on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain. ccarrera@clinic.cat.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spitzoid tumours (ST) represent a diagnostic chal-lenge and the accuracy of dermoscopy in these cases remains unclear. This retrospective study evaluated dermoscopic images collected from 2011 to 2016. Two dermatologists, blinded to clinical/ histopathological data, identified lesions with spitzoid dermoscopic patterns, using histopathology as the gold standard. Of 4,337 dermoscopic images, 240 (5.5%) showed spitzoid dermoscopic patterns (221 patients; median age 40; 57.9 % female). Histopathology revealed 23 % (55/240) ST, 62 % (149/240) non--spitzoid melanocytic lesions and 15 % (36/240) non--melanocytic lesions. Overall, 25.4 % (61/240) were malignant, mainly melanoma/melanoma metastases (50/240). Across excised tumours, 1.5 % (67/4,337) were ST. Sensitivity and specificity were 82.1 % (95% CI 70.8%-90.4%) and 95.7 % (95% CI 95%-96.3%), with an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI 0.84-0.93). Positive predictive value (PPV) was 22.9 % (95% CI 17.8%-28.8%), and nega-tive predictive value (NPV) was 99.7 % (95% CI 99.5%-99.9%). Starburst pattern was more frequent in ST (p=0.007). Linear vessels (OR 5.12; 95% CI 2.08-13.1) and glomerular vessels (OR 3.03; 95% CI 1.37-6.69) correlated with malignancy. Dermoscopy demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy and NPVnegative predictive value. However, low PPVpositive predictive value highlights limited specificity in adults; since one1 in four4 lesions with a spitzoid dermoscopic pattern was malignant, any spitzoid lesion in adults warrants high clinical suspicion.

Indexed as

DermoscopyMelanomaNevus, Epithelioid and Spindle CellSkin NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArea Under CurveBiopsyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID42770911
PMCPMC13595830

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.