ArticlePoultry science2026
Feed color modifies hypothalamic appetite gene regulation and gut function in broiler chickens.
Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to study the impact of feed color on hypothalamic appetite gene regulation, gut function, and performance of broiler chickens. A total of 280 male broiler chicks (Ross 308) were randomly assigned to 20 pens (14 chicks/pen; 5 pens/treatment) and fed a corn-soybean meal control diet or the same diet supplemented with 1.5 g/kg green, purple, or orange colorant. Intestinal histomorphology, serum biochemical markers, and hypothalamic gene expression (NPY, AGRP, POMC, CART) were assessed at the end of trial (42 days of age). Performance criteria were also recorded during the trial. Across the growing and finishing phases, colored feeds increased feed intake and weight gain relative to the control, with the orange group consistently showing the largest effects. The largest improvement in body weight gain and feed conversion ratio (FCR) was recorded in the orange feed group, which was associated with greater improvements in villus height and absorptive surface area in different segments of the small intestine. Green feed showed intermediate benefits, improving feed intake, weight gain, and FCR over the entire trial (1-42 d) but to a lesser extent than orange, while purple feed failed to significantly improve growth performance despite showing comparable improvements in intestinal morphology. Serum cholesterol and HDL concentrations were higher in the green group compared to the control and purple groups, total protein was higher in the orange group compared to the control, and albumin was higher in both green and orange groups compared to the control and purple groups, while hepatic enzymes, MDA, NO, LDL, triglyceride, and glucose did not differ among treatments. Colored feeds stimulated appetite through up-regulation of orexigenic genes (NPY, AGRP) and down-regulation of anorexigenic genes (POMC, CART), with the purple group showing the most pronounced orexigenic gene expression despite its poorer performance. This dissociation may be partly attributed to the reduced feed lightness index of the purple diet. The results of this study could have significant potential for practical application in commercial poultry production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.