ArticleBMJ open2026
Maximising the efficacy of in vivo exposure therapy using smartphone-assisted just-in-time adaptive intervention for anxiety disorders: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06788119 (Analyzing the Benefits of Using SYMPTOMS-JIT for in Vivo Exposure in Anxiety Disorders), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Analyzing the Benefits of Using SYMPTOMS-JIT for in Vivo Exposure in Anxiety Disorders: a Randomized Controlled Trial Using a Mixed Methods Approach
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFor anxiety disorders (ADs), the preferred treatment is cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT), with in vivo exposure (IVE) as its main component. IVE aims to gradually expose the patient to feared stimuli and situations to encourage habituation. Despite its effectiveness, it is a hard component for patients, especially when applied on their own. Therefore, a (co-)therapist usually supports the exposure requiring considerable time and resources. Meanwhile, smartphones have become a promising tool to complement and deliver psychological treatments. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study presents the protocol of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of an app (SyMptOMS-ET) to support IVE for ADs. The app provides a just-in-time momentary ecological intervention by profiting from advanced smartphone features to monitor, interact and guide the patient through the exposure based on their condition and context. Participants (158) will be adult volunteers suffering from Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) ADs (specific phobia, agoraphobia, panic disorder and social anxiety). They will be randomly allocated to (1) CBT with traditional IVE (79) and (2) CBT with IVE using SyMptOMS-ET (79). The Diagnostic Interview for DSM, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) ADs will be used as a diagnostic measure. Primary outcome measures will be assessed with interference and fear scales from the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV and with target behaviours; acceptability, satisfaction, usability and app quality will also be measured. Patients will be assessed at baseline, after treatment and at 1-month, 6-month and 12-month follow-ups. Data will be analysed both per-protocol and by intention-to-treat. It will contribute to the knowledge of just-in-time interventions, making the exposure component more accessible to patients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Universitat Jaume I Ethics Committee (Castellón, Spain) granted approval for the study (CEISH/51/2024). The results from this study will be actively disseminated through manuscript publications and presentations at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06788119.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.