Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42773233›Full record

ReviewCommunications medicine2026

Functional antibody responses and protection against symptomatic dengue.

Caroline Lin Lin Chua, Hoa Thi My Vo, Carla Bianca Luena Victorio, Vinit Upasani, Bryan Ju Min Yap, Andrew Teo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Communications medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Caroline Lin Lin ChuaSchool of Biosciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine Sciences, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Malaysia. lin.lin.chua@taylors.edu.my.
Hoa Thi My VoCentre for Tropical Medicine, Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Carla Bianca Luena VictorioLaboratory for Translational and Molecular Imaging, Cancer and Stem Cell Biology Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1161-5006
Vinit UpasaniDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Molecular Genetics, Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Bryan Ju Min YapSchool of Biosciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine Sciences, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.
Andrew TeoDepartment of Medicine, The Doherty Institute, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. andrewcc.teo@ntu.edu.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4520-2701

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure to dengue virus (DENV) triggers the development of anti-viral antibodies that may contribute to either protection or disease progression. Antibodies exist in different isotypes and subtypes, with diverse specificities and functions. IgG antibodies are produced during primary and secondary DENV infections, where they play a role central role in mediating protective immunity, and may also contribute to antibody-dependent enhancement in a secondary heterotypic infection. Although IgG antibodies are widely recognised as key mediators of protective immune responses during DENV infection, antibody specificities, types and functions that reliably correlate with protection remain unclear. A better understanding of anti-DENV antibodies and their roles in protection against symptomatic dengue is essential especially in guiding the design of dengue vaccines. In this review, antibody functions and effector mechanisms in DENV infection are discussed, with a focus on naturally acquired immunity and neutralising antibody responses following vaccination. In addition, current knowledge gaps in antibody functions during DENV infection will be highlighted.

Identifiers

PMID42773233
PMCPMC13598121

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.