ArticleBMC gastroenterology2026
Prevalence and biopsychosocial associations of functional constipation: a cross-sectional study among adults in Türkiye.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFunctional constipation is a prevalent functional gastrointestinal disorder with substantial public health implications. Evidence on its biopsychosocial determinants in middle-income settings is limited. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of functional constipation and its associations with sociodemographic characteristics, dietary habits, eating behaviors, physical activity, and anthropometric factors among adults in Türkiye.
methodsThis study was conducted with 429 individuals aged 19-64 years who presented for examination and follow-up at the Department of Internal Medicine outpatient clinic of a public hospital in Türkiye. Functional constipation was defined by Rome IV criteria. Constipation severity was assessed with the Constipation Severity Instrument. Eating disorder risk was screened using the five-item The Sick, Control, One Stone, Fat, Food (SCOFF) Questionnaire; picky eating was measured with the Adult Picky Eating Questionnaire. Anthropometrics were measured to compute body mass index (BMI). Physical activity and selected dietary frequencies were self-reported. Predictors of functional constipation were examined via binary logistic regression with covariates informed by prior literature. Statistical significance was set at α = 0.05.
resultsParticipants' mean age was 38.2 ± 15.0 years; 53.1% were female; 50.6% had BMI ≥ 25 kg/m². The prevalence of functional constipation was 21.0% (90/429). In multivariable analyses, higher age (OR = 1.029, 95% CI: 1.005-1.055) and female sex (OR = 1.899, 95% CI: 1.007-3.578) were associated with greater odds of functional constipation. Eating disorder risk was also associated with greater odds of functional constipation (per point on SCOFF: OR = 1.280, 95% CI: 1.024-1.600). In contrast, higher BMI was associated with lower odds (OR = 0.932, 95% CI: 0.879-0.989), and engaging in physical activity was associated with substantially lower odds of functional constipation (OR = 0.168, 95% CI: 0.095-0.300). Family history, smoking, alcohol use, water intake, and frequencies of meat, vegetable, and fruit consumption were not significant in the adjusted model; meal skipping showed borderline significance (OR = 2.001, 95% CI: 0.996-4.020; p = 0.051).
conclusionsThe findings of the study indicate that functional constipation has a considerable prevalence in this clinical adult sample. Functional constipation was associated with older age, female sex, and eating disorder risk, and was inversely associated with higher BMI and physical activity. The results support the routine assessment of eating disorder risk and the promotion of physical activity as part of comprehensive management strategies. Prospective studies are needed to clarify the causal pathways underlying these observed associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.