Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42773471›Full record

ArticleChinese medicine2026

From art to metrics: a closed-loop framework for quantifying dose, manipulation, and feedback.

Wen-Chao Tang, Da-Eun Yoon, Younbyoung Chae

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wen-Chao Tang *School of Artificial Intelligence in Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Da-Eun Yoon *Department of Meridian and Acupoints, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Younbyoung ChaeDepartment of Meridian and Acupoints, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. ybchae@khu.ac.kr.

Funding

Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine KSN2511011National Research Foundation of Korea RS-2024-00449485
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical effects of acupuncture depend heavily on its physical parameters, particularly treatment dose and needling technique. Yet these parameters are still poorly standardized in both research and clinical settings. This reproducibility, hinders interpretation of findings, and complicates practitioner training. In this article we synthesize recent work together to propose a closed-loop framework for precision acupuncture, organized around three linked stages. The input stage defines dose mainly in terms of stimulation intensity and translates traditional diagnostic reasoning into a small set of measurable manipulation parameters. The process stage concerns how that stimulation is physically delivered, how it can be quantified through kinematic metrics, and how it can be taught through sensorimotor training. The control stage uses deqi as a real-time feedback signal, while candidate pretreatment biomarkers are considered as feedforward modifiers for initial dose selection. Taken together, these developments support a more quantitative and technology-assisted approach that preserve traditional clinical reasoning while making acupuncture delivery measurable and reproducible.

Indexed as

Acupuncture doseClosed-loop controlDeqiKinematicsManipulation

Identifiers

PMID42773471
PMCPMC13595726

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.