ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Ophthalmic manifestations of celiac disease in Tabuk City, Saudi Arabia.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Celiac disease (CD) is an autoimmune enteropathy affecting approximately 0.7-1.4% of the global population. However, extraintestinal manifestations of CD, particularly ophthalmic conditions, remain underrecognized. This study aims to describe the spectrum and frequency of ophthalmic manifestations among a cohort of patients with CD in Tabuk, Saudi Arabia. Methods: This 5-year retrospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care center and included 83 patients with CD, with no age restrictions. Patients were identified through the hospital's electronic medical records using a diagnosis of CD established by a gastroenterologist based on standard clinical, serological, and/or histopathological criteria. Ophthalmic manifestations were retrieved from comprehensive ophthalmic examinations documented by ophthalmologists. For analysis, participants were stratified into pediatric (≤14 years) and adult (>14 years) groups based on their age at the time of data collection. Results: Ophthalmic manifestations were identified in 37.3% (95% CI: 27.0 to 48.7%) of the reviewed patient records. The most common ocular manifestations included refractive errors (12, 95% CI: 5.9 to 21.0%), followed by allergic conjunctivitis and dry eye disease (each 4.8, 95% CI: 1.3 to 11.9%). No significant associations were observed between age groups or diabetes mellitus and the prevalence of individual ophthalmic diagnoses. However, when ophthalmic involvement was analyzed as a composite outcome (defined by the presence of any ophthalmic disorder), a multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that older age (adjusted OR: 3.25, 95% CI: 1.09 to 9.66, Conclusion: In this cohort, ophthalmic findings were documented in over one-third of patients with CD. However, the prevalence of refractive errors was comparable to that reported in the general population, and due to the absence of a control group, a disease-specific association between CD and ophthalmic manifestations could not be established. Nevertheless, adults and patients with co-occurring diabetes demonstrated a higher likelihood of ocular involvement. These results highlight the need to raise awareness of ocular findings in patients with CD among healthcare professionals. Future controlled studies, particularly matched case-control or prospective cohort designs, are recommended to better assess these potential associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.