Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42774427›Full record

ReviewHeart rhythm O22026

Artificial intelligence and biomarker-driven prediction of post-coronary artery bypass grafting atrial fibrillation: Integrating clinical, genomic, and metabolic insights.

Muhammad Usman Ghani, Abhishek Prasad, Jai Sivanandan Nagarajan, Darsh Tusharbhai Patel, Rupak Desai, Subramanian Gnanaguruparan, Subhasis Chatterjee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heart rhythm O2, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Muhammad Usman GhaniDepartment of Internal Medicine, Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, Michigan.
Abhishek PrasadDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Jai Sivanandan NagarajanDepartment of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York.
Darsh Tusharbhai PatelDepartment of Medicine, Mercy Catholic Medical Center, Darby, Pennsylvania.
Rupak DesaiIndependent Researcher, Outcomes Research, Atlanta, Georgia.
Subramanian GnanaguruparanDivision of Cardiology, Christiana Hospital, Newark, Delaware.
Subhasis ChatterjeeMichael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) remains one of the most frequent and consequential complications after coronary artery bypass grafting, occurring in 15%-30% of patients and contributing to increased morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, and higher long-term mortality. Despite decades of investigation, traditional risk models have shown limited predictive accuracy owing to the multifactorial nature of POAF. Objective: This review synthesizes the emerging evidence from recent studies applying artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) approaches for POAF prediction, with focus on clinical, biochemical, genomic, and molecular dimensions. Methods: We conducted a structured narrative review of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar for studies evaluating AI and ML-based prediction of POAF following isolated coronary artery bypass grafting published from January 2020 through 2025. Search terms included POAF, coronary artery bypass grafting, ML, AI, pharmacogenomics, and biomarkers. A total of 9 studies met inclusion criteria and were synthesized narratively given the heterogeneity in study designs and outcomes. Results: Across studies, modern algorithms demonstrate areas under the curve receiver operating characteristic between 0.80 and 0.93, with performance exceeding that reported for traditional clinical risk scores. However, external validation, model calibration, and biases remain to be fully addressed before clinical translation is considered. Conclusion: The convergence of interpretable AI, metabolic and genetic biomarkers, and clinical data offers a promising path toward individualized risk stratification and targeted postoperative management.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceCoronary artery bypass graftingMachine learningPostoperative atrial fibrillationPredictive modeling

Identifiers

PMID42774427
PMCPMC13594494

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.