ReviewEXCLI journal2026
Artificial intelligence in the cath lab: Bridging predictive models and real-time procedural decision support.
Review in EXCLI journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in medicine has been revolutionary, particularly in cardiology, where AI offers transformative tools for data integration, image analysis, and predictive modeling. In procedural settings such as percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) planning, where timely decision-making is crucial, AI represents a promising avenue for real-time risk prediction. However, current clinical scores and risk models often fall short in dynamic environments like the catheterization (cath) lab due to their static nature and limited adaptability to intra-procedural complexities. Emerging AI models aim to leverage high-frequency physiological data, procedural metadata, and multimodal imaging to recognize evolving patterns and anticipate complications. Nevertheless, most existing applications remain retrospective, lack real-time integration, and are constrained by limited external validation. Looking ahead, the implementation of real-time AI systems in the cath lab holds significant potential to enhance procedural safety and outcomes by delivering anticipatory alerts and actionable insights that support clinical decision-making during PCI. However, it is important to note that most currently available AI models remain retrospective or observational in nature, and prospective evidence demonstrating improved clinical outcomes through real-time AI-guided interventions remains limited. See also the graphical abstract(Fig. 1).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.